I don’t think that’s true. They are using the index of bing, but the search results are not. At least that’s what I heard, no idea if it’s factual or not.
I don’t think that’s true. They are using the index of bing, but the search results are not. At least that’s what I heard, no idea if it’s factual or not.
You’d be better off selfhosting something like searxNG
Because there are no games made for the PSP anymore.
If we compare the prices of two devices, we compare the prices of two devices, not the original factory price and a refurbished price.
No but what’s the dumbass comparison lmao
Not an argument, you can also buy refurbished switch for 150 - 200
Nah, if you voluntarily join a tankie instance, you are the one who’s stupid.
lemmy.ml with the stupid authoritarian takes again.
I like this. I don’t think I need a large company fact-checking anything tbh. They already got too much influence and power, I don’t need them to control the narrative even more.
Only someone from lemmy.ml could make up such a idiotic statement.
My point was not that apple is a protector of your data, obviously they’re not. No large corporation is. The entire ecosystem of google and facebook would not work without data.
My point was that corporations in the west actually have a chance of fighting against subpoenas and other ways the government might force them to hand out user data, whereas china will probably just make the CEO disappear mysteriously if they don’t comply immediately.
No.
Many companies in the western world will not freely give your information to law enforcement and will even actively fight it. We saw that with apple, we saw that with signal and specifically in germany, we had some other smaller profile cases that have fought law enforcement.
In China, companies are forced to give the government free access to all of its information without any subpoena or anything needed. Which is why many western companies can’t do business in china themselves without having a Chinese partner company that handles it for them (Blizzard needed NetEase, for example)
Lemmy is Anti-Tiktok, but Lemmy is even more Anti-America
Meta hasn’t invented anything ever and their only attempt failed miserably. All of their successful products are bought from competitors.
I hate apple like the next Linux evangelist, but meta is just as bad.
Lmao calm down AI can’t even reliably differentiate cats from dogs
So counter strike was not gambling before they started to sell hardware?
Nuclear options rarely are the best ones, especially in a case where the harm caused doesn’t even remotely warrant it.
Parents should keep an eye on their kids so this can’t happen. That’s what parents are supposed to do. Removing a good feature because “MUUUH THINK OF THE KIDS” is wrong.
I think more responsibility should be on the individual and responsibility on the parents for minors.
At least we can agree on that.
I do think that we should expect easier parental controls with more granular settings to be able to allow parents to protect their kids from risky trades
Steam has an entire parental control setup with family view where you can completely restrict your children from purchasing or selling anything without your consent.
https://store.steampowered.com/news/app/593110/view/4149575031735702628
Yes eBay and Amazon is responsible for not vetting sellers and buyers on their platforms
Guess we fundamentally disagree on this point then.
I’m really excited about your explanation how a pump and dump is going to work when openAI is not even publicly traded. So who’s gonna pump and dump what exactly?