No. He’s lying about that part. He worships his own ego.

This is what happens to IT professionals when the centralization of textbook design is no longer appropriate the situations. All they’ve got is a hammer. So, everything’s a nail, even if it means lying.

There’s application in responding to requests for information quickly, in a mesh network, perhaps in presence of malactors. For example the medical records of injured US soldiers are stored in and delivered using a block chain solution.

There’s application in a hypothetical currency free from the corruption of governance. For example, an orange President couldn’t print gobs of money during a pandemic, devaluing your currency, then hand that money to corporations.

An LLM?

Edit: Everything is of far less significance relative IRL relationships. The overriding goal of ML analysis model with a subordinated LLM hasn’t been to create a space for the best mental masturbation, instead to better focus subsequent human efforts in organizational recruitment for education and praxis.

In the future?

What’s meritable often isn’t popular. By what metric should comments be rated?

Many will rate high. By what means can the set be further narrowed?

A lion sucks if measured as a bird.

Yet, it takes an enormous amount of processing power to produce a comment such as this one. How much would it take to reason why the experiment was structured as it was?